(Если не открывается, то https://archive.org/stream/report-mh17-crash-en/report-mh17-crash-en_djvu.txt )
c. The NOTAMs did not contain any substantive reason for the altitude restrictions.
Therefore, Ukraine did not act in accordance with the guidelines in ICAO Doc
d. When implementing the above measures, the Ukrainian authorities took insufficient
notice of the possibility of a civil aeroplane at cruising altitude being fired upon.
This was also the case, when, according to the Ukrainian authorities, the shooting-
down of an Antonov An-26 on 14 July 2014 and that of a Sukhoi Su-25 on 16 July
2014 occurred while these aeroplanes were flying at altitudes beyond the effective
range of MANPADS. The weapon systems mentioned by the Ukrainian authorities
in relation to the shooting down of these aircraft can pose a risk to civil aeroplanes,
because they are capable of reaching their cruising altitude. However, no measures
were taken to protect civil aeroplanes against these weapon systems.